ArcGIS REST Services Directory Login
Home > services > NARA_EN (MapServer) > Legend API Reference
JSON

Legend (NARA_EN)

Synthesis map Potential supply 'Food production' (2)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Biophysical suitability for food production arable fields (yield compared to maximal yield) (3)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
81-100% 81-100%
Biophysical suitability for food production maize (yield compared to maximal yield) (4)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
81-100% 81-100%
Biophysical suitability for food production grassland (yield compared to maximal yield) (5)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
81-100% 81-100%
Biophysical suitability for food production vegetables (yield compared to maximal yield) (6)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
81-100% 81-100%
Biophysical suitability for food production fruits (yield compared to maximal yield) (7)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
81-100% 81-100%
Potential supply food production grassland (yield compared to maximal yield) (8)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Potential supply food production arable fields (yield compared to maximal yield) (9)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Potential supply food production maize (yield compared to maximal yield) (10)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Potential supply food production vegetables (yield compared to maximal yield) (11)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Potential supply food production fruits (yield compared to maximal yield) (12)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Actual supply food supply arable fields (yield compared to maximal yield) (13)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Actual supply food supply maize (yield compared to maximal yield) (14)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Actual supply food supply grassland (yield compared to maximal yield) (15)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Actual supply food supply vegetables (yield compared to maximal yield) (16)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Actual supply food supply fruits (yield compared to maximal yield) (17)
NA NA
0% 0%
1-20% 1-20%
21-40% 21-40%
41-60% 41-60%
61-80% 61-80%
>80% >80%
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Game production' (19)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Total weight of game (kg/100ha) (20)
7 - 56 7 - 56
56 - 65 56 - 65
65 - 76 65 - 76
76 - 94 76 - 94
94 - 353 94 - 353
Total value of game (Euro/100ha) (21)
35 - 141 35 - 141
141 - 167 141 - 167
167 - 201 167 - 201
201 - 247 201 - 247
247 - 1109 247 - 1109
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Wood production' (23)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Biophysical suitability for wood production (virtual wood production m³/ha/year) (24)
0 0
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
Potential supply wood production (BMS_factor in m³/ha/year) (25)
0 0
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
18 18
20 20
Actual supply wood production (m³/ha/year) (26)
0 - 1 0 - 1
1 - 2 1 - 2
2 - 3 2 - 3
3 - 4 3 - 4
4 - 5 4 - 5
5 - 6 5 - 6
6 - 7 6 - 7
7 - 8 7 - 8
8 - 9 8 - 9
9 - 10 9 - 10
10 - 11 10 - 11
11 - 12 11 - 12
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Production of energy crops' (28)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Biophysical suitability for energy from crops (in GJ/10ha/year) (29)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Biophysical suitability for energy from grass clippings (in GJ/10ha/year) (30)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Biophysical suitability for energy from wood (in GJ/10ha/year) (31)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Potential supply of energy from crops (in GJ/10ha/year) (32)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Potential supply of energy from grass clippings (in GJ/10ha/year) (33)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Potential supply of energy from wood (in GJ/10ha/year) (34)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Actual supply of energry from crops (in GJ/10ha/year) (35)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Actual supply of energy from grass clippings (in GJ/10ha/year) (36)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Actual supply of energy from wood (in GJ/10ha/year) (37)
0 - 10 0 - 10
10 - 100 10 - 100
100 - 200 100 - 200
200 - 500 200 - 500
500 - 1000 500 - 1000
1000 - 1500 1000 - 1500
1500 - 3000 1500 - 3000
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Pollination' (39)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Habitat suitability pollinators (40)
Not suitable Not suitable
Suitable Suitable
Potential pollination supply - all pollinators (in probability pollinators are present) (41)
<10% <10%
10 - 25% 10 - 25%
25 - 50% 25 - 50%
50 - 75% 50 - 75%
>75% >75%
Potential pollination supply - wild bees (in probability pollinators are present) (42)
<10% <10%
10 - 25% 10 - 25%
25 - 50% 25 - 50%
50 - 75% 50 - 75%
>75% >75%
Pollination demand (43)
NA NA
No demand No demand
Low demand Low demand
Intermediate demand Intermediate demand
High demand High demand
Very high demand Very high demand
Potential use of pollination - all pollinators (relative score) (44)
Hoog - Laag Hoog - Laag
Potential use of pollination - wild bees (relative score) (45)
Hoog - Laag Hoog - Laag
Biophysical suitability for the maintenance of soil fertility (47)
NA NA
very good very good
good good
rather good rather good
intermediate intermediate
rather poor rather poor
poor poor
very poor very poor
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Air quality regulation' (49)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Roughness map (roughness lengths in cm) (50)
20000 - 2 20000 - 2
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Regulation of noise' (52)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Supply noise reduction (physical impact) (53)
Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 1 Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 1
Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 2 Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 2
Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 3 Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 3
Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 1 Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 1
Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 2 Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 2
Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 3 Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 3
Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 1 Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 1
Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 2 Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 2
Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 3 Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 3
Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 1 Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 1
Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 2 Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 2
Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 3 Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 3
Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 1 Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 1
Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 2 Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 2
Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 3 Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 3
Supply noise reduction (psychological impact) (54)
Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 1 Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 1
Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 2 Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 2
Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 3 Zone > 75 db - noise reduction 3
Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 1 Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 1
Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 2 Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 2
Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 3 Zone 70-74 db - noise reduction 3
Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 1 Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 1
Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 2 Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 2
Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 3 Zone 65-69 db - noise reduction 3
Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 1 Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 1
Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 2 Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 2
Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 3 Zone 60-64 db - noise reduction 3
Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 1 Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 1
Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 2 Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 2
Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 3 Zone 55-59 db - noise reduction 3
Demand to noise reduction (55)
Zone > 75 db - buit-up Zone > 75 db - buit-up
Zone > 75 db - nature Zone > 75 db - nature
Zone 70-74 db - buit-up Zone 70-74 db - buit-up
Zone 70-74 db - nature Zone 70-74 db - nature
Zone 65-69 db - buit-up Zone 65-69 db - buit-up
Zone 65-69 db - nature Zone 65-69 db - nature
Zone 60-64 db - buit-up Zone 60-64 db - buit-up
Zone 60-64 db - nature Zone 60-64 db - nature
Zone 55-59 db - buit-up Zone 55-59 db - buit-up
Zone 55-59 db - nature Zone 55-59 db - nature
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Regulation of erosion risk' (57)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Actual water erosion (58)
Ignorable Ignorable
Very little Very little
Little Little
Medium-little Medium-little
Medium-much Medium-much
Much Much
Very much Very much
Water erosion reduction due to landcover (59)
Very high additional erosion Very high additional erosion
High additional erosion High additional erosion
Rather high additional erosion Rather high additional erosion
Median additional erosion Median additional erosion
Little additional erosion Little additional erosion
Very little additional erosion Very little additional erosion
Ignorable additional erosion Ignorable additional erosion
No supply No supply
Ignorable supply Ignorable supply
Very little supply Very little supply
Little supply Little supply
Median supply Median supply
Rather high supply Rather high supply
High supply High supply
Very high supply Very high supply
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Flood protection' (61)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Designated flood plains (62)
existing existing
planned / to be researched planned / to be researched
Land use vulnarability to flooding in all areas under flooding risk (combinability score) (63)
Not combinable zone (score < 3) Not combinable zone (score < 3)
Little combinable zone (score 3 - 3.5) Little combinable zone (score 3 - 3.5)
Medium combinable zone (score 3.5-3.75) Medium combinable zone (score 3.5-3.75)
Better combinable zone (score 3.75 -4) Better combinable zone (score 3.75 -4)
Best combinable zone (score > 4) Best combinable zone (score > 4)
Population density in all areas under flooding risk (number of inhabitants/ha) (64)
0 - 0.1 0 - 0.1
0.1 - 1 0.1 - 1
1 - 10 1 - 10
10 - 50 10 - 50
50 - 100 50 - 100
>100 >100
Population density in recently flooded areas (number of inhabitants/ha) (65)
0 - 0.1 0 - 0.1
0.1 - 1 0.1 - 1
1 - 10 1 - 10
10 - 50 10 - 50
50 - 100 50 - 100
>100 >100
Land use vulnarability to flooding in recently flooded areas (66)
Outside flooding area Outside flooding area
Impossible to translocate - possible victems Impossible to translocate - possible victems
Impossible to translocate - no victems Impossible to translocate - no victems
Difficult to translocate Difficult to translocate
Easy to translocate Easy to translocate
Adapted- no need to translocate Adapted- no need to translocate
Buildings in all areas under flooding risk (% built-up) (67)
0 - 12.5% 0 - 12.5%
12.5 - 25% 12.5 - 25%
25 - 50% 25 - 50%
50 - 75% 50 - 75%
75- 100% 75- 100%
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Coastal Protection' (69)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Biophysical suitability for coastal protection (70)
Sea-defence dunes higher than 5m TAW Sea-defence dunes higher than 5m TAW
Potential supply of coastal protection (71)
Broad sea-defence dunes Broad sea-defence dunes
Small sea-defence dunes Small sea-defence dunes
Actual supply of coastal protection (72)
Dynamic sea-defence dunes Dynamic sea-defence dunes
Intermediate sea-defence dunes Intermediate sea-defence dunes
Stabile sea-defence dunes Stabile sea-defence dunes
Small sea-defence dunes Small sea-defence dunes
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Global climate regulation' (74)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Biophysical suitability for carbon storage in soil (75)
NA NA
Very low Very low
low low
Median Median
High High
Very high Very high
Actual carbon stock in soils under arable fields (ton C/ha in upper 30 cm) (76)
39 - 47 39 - 47
47 - 52 47 - 52
52 - 56 52 - 56
56 - 59 56 - 59
59 - 92 59 - 92
Actual carbon stock in soils under grassland (ton C/ha in upper 30 cm) (77)
51 - 66 51 - 66
66 - 72 66 - 72
72 - 75 72 - 75
75 - 80 75 - 80
80 - 113 80 - 113
Actual carbon stock in soils under forest and nature (ton C/ha in upper 30 cm) (78)
81 - 93 81 - 93
93 - 95 93 - 95
95 - 117 95 - 117
117 - 157 117 - 157
157 - 356 157 - 356
Synthesis map Potential supply 'Green space for outdoor activities' (80)
No supply No supply
Lowest supply Lowest supply
Low supply Low supply
Median supply Median supply
High supply High supply
Highest supply Highest supply
Supply of nearby urban green (neighbourhood) (81)
Nature Nature
Agriculture Agriculture
Demand for nearby urban green (neighbourhood) (82)
No buildings No buildings
Buildings with neighbourhood green (nature) Buildings with neighbourhood green (nature)
Buildings with neighbourhood green (agriculture) Buildings with neighbourhood green (agriculture)
Buildings without neighbourhood green Buildings without neighbourhood green
Supply of nearby urban green (district level) (83)
Nature Nature
Agriculture Agriculture
Demand for nearby urban green (district level) (84)
No buildings No buildings
Buildings with district level green (nature) Buildings with district level green (nature)
Buildings with district level green (agriculture) Buildings with district level green (agriculture)
Buildings without district level green Buildings without district level green
Potential use of urban green (neighbourhood) (ratio area built-up / area urban green) (85)
0 - 0.1 0 - 0.1
0.1 - 1 0.1 - 1
1 - 5 1 - 5
5 - 10 5 - 10
> 10 > 10
Potential use of urban green (district level) (ratio area built-up / area urban green) (86)
0 - 0.1 0 - 0.1
0.1 - 1 0.1 - 1
1 - 5 1 - 5
5 - 10 5 - 10
> 10 > 10
Supply of recreational green (87)
very low very low
low low
median median
high high
very high very high
Demand for recreational green (population density in inhabitants/ha) (88)
< 41 < 41
41 - 88 41 - 88
88 - 141 88 - 141
141 - 278 141 - 278
278 - 1000 278 - 1000
Proportion of 'open' (unbuilt) landcover in gridcell (in %) (89)
0 - 27% 0 - 27%
27 - 50% 27 - 50%
50 - 68% 50 - 68%
68 - 84% 68 - 84%
>84% >84%
Proportion of nature in gridcell (in %) (90)
<1% <1%
1 - 5% 1 - 5%
5 - 10% 5 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
>20% >20%
Proportion of cultural heritage areas in gridcell (in %) (91)
0 - 13% 0 - 13%
13 - 36% 13 - 36%
36 - 61% 36 - 61%
61 - 86% 61 - 86%
>86% >86%
Proportion of gridcell with noise pollution (in %) (92)
<11% <11%
11 - 30% 11 - 30%
30 - 54% 30 - 54%
54 - 81% 54 - 81%
>81% >81%
Ecosystem map (MAES typology) (95)
Urban Urban
Cropland Cropland
Grassland Grassland
Woodland and forest Woodland and forest
Heathland and inland dunes Heathland and inland dunes
Wetlands Wetlands
Water Water
coastal dunes and beach coastal dunes and beach
estuary, mudflats and saltmarshes estuary, mudflats and saltmarshes
Landuse map Flanders Regional Ecosystem Assessment Level 1 (96)
Other Other
Urban Urban
Other green Other green
Water Water
Forest Forest
Semi-natural grassland Semi-natural grassland
Heathland Heathland
Coastal dunes Coastal dunes
Agriculture Agriculture
Wetland Wetland
Mudflats and saltmarshes Mudflats and saltmarshes
Landuse map Flanders Regional Ecosystem Assessment Level 2 (97)
Other Other
Hotel/Catering Hotel/Catering
Industry Industry
Infrastructure Infrastructure
Military Military
Recreation/Sports Recreation/Sports
Residential/Commercial Residential/Commercial
Commercial/Light industry Commercial/Light industry
Harbour Harbour
Other high green Other high green
Other low green Other low green
Ruderal and pioneer vegetation Ruderal and pioneer vegetation
Shrub Shrub
Water Water
Deciduous - medium productivity Deciduous - medium productivity
Deciduous - high productivity Deciduous - high productivity
Coniferous- high productivity Coniferous- high productivity
Coniferous- medium productivity Coniferous- medium productivity
Seminatural grassland - nutrient poor and dry Seminatural grassland - nutrient poor and dry
Seminatural grassland - nutrient poor and wet Seminatural grassland - nutrient poor and wet
Seminatural grassland - nutrient rich and dry Seminatural grassland - nutrient rich and dry
Seminatural grassland - nutrient rich and wet Seminatural grassland - nutrient rich and wet
Dry heathland Dry heathland
Wet heathland Wet heathland
Open dunes Open dunes
Closed dunes Closed dunes
Beach Beach
Cropland Cropland
Orchard (high-stem) Orchard (high-stem)
Orchard (low-stem) Orchard (low-stem)
Permanent agricultural grassland Permanent agricultural grassland
Temporary agricultural grassland Temporary agricultural grassland
Vegetables - fruits - horticulture Vegetables - fruits - horticulture
short-rotation-intensive-culture wood short-rotation-intensive-culture wood
Maize Maize
Wetland Wetland
Reedbed Reedbed
Saltmarsh Saltmarsh
Mudflat Mudflat
Mudflat or Saltmarsh Mudflat or Saltmarsh
Landuse map Flanders Regional Ecosystem Assessment Level 3 (98)
Other Other
Hotel/Catering - building Hotel/Catering - building
Hotel/Catering - high green Hotel/Catering - high green
Hotel/Catering - low green Hotel/Catering - low green
Hotel/Catering - other Hotel/Catering - other
Industry - building Industry - building
Industry - high green Industry - high green
Industry - low green Industry - low green
Industry - other Industry - other
Infrastructure Infrastructure
Military zone - building Military zone - building
Military zone - high green Military zone - high green
Military zone - low green Military zone - low green
Military zone - other Military zone - other
Recreation/Sports - buidling Recreation/Sports - buidling
Recreation/Sports - high green Recreation/Sports - high green
Recreation/Sports - low green Recreation/Sports - low green
Recreation/Sports - other Recreation/Sports - other
Residential/commercial - building Residential/commercial - building
Residential/commercial - high green Residential/commercial - high green
Residential/commercial- low green Residential/commercial- low green
Residential/commercial - other Residential/commercial - other
Residential/commercial - agriculture Residential/commercial - agriculture
Commercial/light industry - building Commercial/light industry - building
Commercial/light industry - high green Commercial/light industry - high green
Commercial/light industry - low green Commercial/light industry - low green
Commercial/light industry - other Commercial/light industry - other
Harbour - building Harbour - building
Harbour - high green Harbour - high green
Harbour - low green Harbour - low green
Harbour - other Harbour - other
Other - high green Other - high green
Other - low green Other - low green
Ruderal and pioneer vegetation Ruderal and pioneer vegetation
Shrub Shrub
Water Water
Deciduous - other (from 'bosreferentielaag') Deciduous - other (from 'bosreferentielaag')
Beech Beech
Beech + coniferous Beech + coniferous
Oak Oak
Oak + coniferous Oak + coniferous
Other deciduous + coniferous Other deciduous + coniferous
Alder - ash - willow Alder - ash - willow
Deciduous - other (from biological valuation map) Deciduous - other (from biological valuation map)
Poplar Poplar
Poplar + coniferous Poplar + coniferous
Poplar (from biological valuation map) Poplar (from biological valuation map)
Coniferous - other (from 'bosreferentielaag') Coniferous - other (from 'bosreferentielaag')
Other coniferous - deciduous Other coniferous - deciduous
Douglas fir Douglas fir
Douglas fir + deciduous Douglas fir + deciduous
Norway spruce Norway spruce
Norway spruce + deciduous Norway spruce + deciduous
Larch Larch
Larch + deciduous Larch + deciduous
Black pine Black pine
Black pine + deciduous Black pine + deciduous
Coniferous - other (from biological valuation map) Coniferous - other (from biological valuation map)
Scots pine Scots pine
Scots pine + deciduous Scots pine + deciduous
Scots pine (from biological valuation map) Scots pine (from biological valuation map)
Seminatural grassland - nutrient poor and dry Seminatural grassland - nutrient poor and dry
Seminatural grassland - nutrient poor and wet Seminatural grassland - nutrient poor and wet
Seminatural grassland - nutrient rich and dry Seminatural grassland - nutrient rich and dry
Seminatural grassland - nutrient rich and wet Seminatural grassland - nutrient rich and wet
Dry heathland Dry heathland
Wet heathland Wet heathland
Moss dune / grey dune Moss dune / grey dune
Marram dune / white dune Marram dune / white dune
Other open dune Other open dune
Closed dune Closed dune
Beach Beach
Potatoes Potatoes
Strawberry plants Strawberry plants
Strawberry plants Strawberry plants
Chicory Chicory
Protein crops Protein crops
Fruit and nuts Fruit and nuts
Cereals Cereals
Hop Hop
Woody crops Woody crops
Colza Colza
Oil-rich seeds Oil-rich seeds
Elephant grass / Milky thistle Elephant grass / Milky thistle
Other crop Other crop
Rapeseed Rapeseed
Sugar beets Sugar beets
Tobacco Tobacco
Flax and hemp Flax and hemp
Fodder - other Fodder - other
Fodder - beets Fodder - beets
Cropland - other Cropland - other
Orchard (high-stem) Orchard (high-stem)
Orchard (low-stem) Orchard (low-stem)
Permanent grassland Permanent grassland
Permanent agricultural grassland Permanent agricultural grassland
Meadow with trees (>50/ha) Meadow with trees (>50/ha)
Temporary agricultural grassland Temporary agricultural grassland
Grass carpets Grass carpets
Nursery for fruit plants Nursery for fruit plants
Vegetables Vegetables
Nursery for horticulture Nursery for horticulture
Herbs Herbs
Nursery for vegetables Nursery for vegetables
Ornate plants Ornate plants
Horticulture Horticulture
short-rotation-intensive-culture wood short-rotation-intensive-culture wood
Maize - kernels Maize - kernels
Maize - silage Maize - silage
Wetland Wetland
Reedbed Reedbed
Saltmarsh Saltmarsh
Mudflat Mudflat
Mudflat or Saltmarsh Mudflat or Saltmarsh
Ecosystem valuation based on Biological Valuation Map and Habitat map (99)
Less valuable - built-up Less valuable - built-up
Less valuable - unbuilt Less valuable - unbuilt
Valuable - less valuable with valuable elements Valuable - less valuable with valuable elements
Very valuable / valuable with very valuable elements Very valuable / valuable with very valuable elements
Regionally important biotopes / Natura 2000 habitats Regionally important biotopes / Natura 2000 habitats
Modelled hotspot for 6 taxonomical groups (score) (101)
5 - 10 5 - 10
10 - 14 10 - 14
14 - 18 14 - 18
18 - 22 18 - 22
22 - 26 22 - 26
26 - 30 26 - 30
30 - 40 30 - 40
Modelled hotspot for Red List species from 6 taxonomical groups (Red List score) (102)
< 75 < 75
75 - 125 75 - 125
125 - 175 125 - 175
175 - 225 175 - 225
225 - 275 225 - 275
275 - 325 275 - 325
> 325 > 325
Modelled hotspot for flowering plants (number of species) (103)
42 - 70 42 - 70
70 - 90 70 - 90
90 - 110 90 - 110
110 - 130 110 - 130
130 - 150 130 - 150
150 - 170 150 - 170
170 - 195 170 - 195
Modelled hotspot for breeding birds (number of species) (104)
3 - 10 3 - 10
10 - 20 10 - 20
20 - 30 20 - 30
30 - 35 30 - 35
35 - 40 35 - 40
40 - 45 40 - 45
45 - 58 45 - 58
Modelled hotspot for grasshoppers (Orthoptera) (number of species) (105)
0 - 2 0 - 2
2 - 4 2 - 4
4 - 6 4 - 6
6 - 8 6 - 8
8 - 10 8 - 10
10 - 12 10 - 12
12 - 17 12 - 17
Modelled hotspot for butterflies (number of species) (106)
2 - 4 2 - 4
4 - 6 4 - 6
6 - 8 6 - 8
8 - 10 8 - 10
10 - 12 10 - 12
12 - 14 12 - 14
14 - 17 14 - 17
Modelled hotspot for dragonflies (Odonata) (number of species) (107)
0 - 3 0 - 3
3 - 7 3 - 7
7 - 12 7 - 12
12 - 17 12 - 17
17 - 22 17 - 22
22 - 27 22 - 27
27 - 34 27 - 34
Modelled hotspot for amphibians and reptiles (number of species) (108)
0 0
0 - 2 0 - 2
2 - 4 2 - 4
4 - 6 4 - 6
6 - 8 6 - 8
8 - 10 8 - 10
10 - 11 10 - 11
Landuse change 2050 Inhabited area. Probability of changes (positive = increase, negative = decrease in inhabitat areas) (110)
High : 100 - Low : -100 High : 100 - Low : -100
Landuse change 2050 Commercial and industry. Probability of changes (positive = increase, negative = decrease in commercial and industrial areas) (111)
High : 100 - Low : -100 High : 100 - Low : -100
Landuse change 2050 Nature and open areas. Probability of changes (positive = increase, negative = decrease in natural and open areas) (112)
High : 100 - Low : -100 High : 100 - Low : -100
Number of observed neophytes (number of species) (114)
1 - 5 1 - 5
6 - 15 6 - 15
16 - 30 16 - 30
31 - 50 31 - 50
51 - 100 51 - 100
Number of observed invasive plants (number of species on blacklist) (115)
1 - 2 1 - 2
3 - 4 3 - 4
5 - 6 5 - 6
7 - 9 7 - 9
10 - 14 10 - 14
Number of 'missing data' in Flanders Regional Ecosystem Assessment ESS-synthesis maps (118)
<3 <3
3 3
4 4
5 5
>5 >5
Ecosystem service hotspot map (unweighted score). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (119)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Ecosystem service hotspot map (weighted score). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (120)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Ecosystem service hotspot map (producing services). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (121)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Ecosystem service hotspot map (regulating services). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (122)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Ecosystem service hotspot map (cultural services). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (123)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Ecosystem service hotspot map (producing services - nutrition). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (124)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Ecosystem service hotspot map (producing services - materials and energy). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (125)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Ecosystem service hotspot map (regulating services - mediation of flows, waste, toxics and other nuisances). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (126)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Ecosystem service hotspot map (regulating services - maintenance of physical, chemical, biological conditions). (proportion of ecosystem services with score above average) (127)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Potential supply wood production - averaged over broad landuse classes in Flanders (129)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply wood production - averaged over intermediate landuse classes in Flanders (130)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply wood production - averaged over detailed landuse classes in Flanders (131)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply wood production - averaged over broad landuse classes within a physical unit (132)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply wood production - averaged over intermediate landuse classes within a physical unit (133)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply wood production - averaged over detailed landuse classes within a physical unit (134)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply clean water production - averaged over broad landuse classes in Flanders (135)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply clean water production - averaged over intermediate landuse classes in Flanders (136)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply clean water production - averaged over detailed landuse classes in Flanders (137)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply clean water production - averaged over broad landuse classes within a physical unit (138)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply clean water production - averaged over intermediate landuse classes within a physical unit (139)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply clean water production - averaged over detailed landuse classes within a physical unit (140)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply global climate regulation - averaged over broad landuse classes in Flanders (141)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply global climate regulation - averaged over intermediate landuse classes in Flanders (142)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply global climate regulation - averaged over detailed landuse classes in Flanders (143)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply global climate regulation - averaged over broad landuse classes within a physical unit (144)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply global climate regulation - averaged over intermediate landuse classes within a physical unit (145)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Potential supply global climate regulation - averaged over detailed landuse classes within a physical unit (146)
lowest supply lowest supply
low supply low supply
medium supply medium supply
high supply high supply
highest supply highest supply
Value of food production of arable fields (including subsidy) (€/ha/year) (148)
492 - 500 492 - 500
501 - 1 000 501 - 1 000
1 001 - 1 592 1 001 - 1 592
Value of food production of arable fields (excluding subsidy) (€/ha/year) (149)
118 - 200 118 - 200
201 - 500 201 - 500
501 - 1.000 501 - 1.000
1 001 - 1 158 1 001 - 1 158
Value of wood production (€/ha/year) (150)
58 - 120 58 - 120
121 - 160 121 - 160
161 - 200 161 - 200
201 - 213 201 - 213
Value of global climate regulation (carbon stock in soil and biomass) (€/ha/year) (151)
-137 - 0 -137 - 0
1 - 50 1 - 50
51 - 100 51 - 100
101 - 150 101 - 150
151 - 260 151 - 260
Netto value woodproduction + global climate regulation - food production (excl subsidy) (€/ha/year) (152)
-6 306 - -1 400 -6 306 - -1 400
-1 399 - -500 -1 399 - -500
-499 - 0 -499 - 0
1 - 100 1 - 100
101 - 250 101 - 250
251 - 562 251 - 562
Risk of flooding (historical-pedological) (155)
Flooding/sediments from stream Flooding/sediments from stream
Mixture zone: flooding/sediments from steams and run-off water Mixture zone: flooding/sediments from steams and run-off water
Flooding/sediments from run-off water Flooding/sediments from run-off water
Flooding/sediments from river Flooding/sediments from river
Flooding/sediments from see Flooding/sediments from see
Recently flooded areas (actual flooding after 1988) (156)
Risk of flooding (historical-pedological + actual) (157)
No flooding area No flooding area
Effective flooding area Effective flooding area
Potential flooding area Potential flooding area
Biophysical potential of water infiltration (mm/year) (159)
0 - 50 0 - 50
50 - 100 50 - 100
100 - 150 100 - 150
150 - 200 150 - 200
200 - 250 200 - 250
250 - 300 250 - 300
300 - 350 300 - 350
350 - 400 350 - 400
400 - 450 400 - 450
Groundwater infiltration loss (relative score) (160)
1 (very low) 1 (very low)
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 (very high) 10 (very high)
Actual water infiltration (mm/year) (161)
0 - 50 0 - 50
50 - 100 50 - 100
100 - 150 100 - 150
150 - 200 150 - 200
200 - 250 200 - 250
250 - 300 250 - 300
300 - 350 300 - 350
350 - 400 350 - 400
400 - 450 400 - 450
Groundwater extraction (percentage of infiltrated water that is extracted) (162)
1 - 5% 1 - 5%
5 - 10% 5 - 10%
10 - 15% 10 - 15%
15 - 20% 15 - 20%
20 - 25% 20 - 25%
25 - 30% 25 - 30%
30 - 35% 30 - 35%
35 - 40% 35 - 40%
Denitrification rates under natural groundwater levels (percentage nitrogen removed) (164)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%
Denitrification rates under actual groundwater levels (percentage nitrogen removed) (165)
0 - 10% 0 - 10%
10 - 20% 10 - 20%
20 - 30% 20 - 30%
30 - 40% 30 - 40%
40 - 50% 40 - 50%
50 - 60% 50 - 60%
60 - 70% 60 - 70%
70 - 80% 70 - 80%
80 - 90% 80 - 90%
90 - 100% 90 - 100%